Talk:Rachel Alucard/@comment-180.194.248.75-20140615132719/@comment-81.190.139.158-20140619160559

Seeing as Rachel is a chronophantasma and that:

Chronophantasma (刻の幻影 Kuronofantazuma, The Phantom of Time) is a title for those who are exceptions to the time-line. Their future is not present, there is no fate for them. They are immune to the Phenomenon Intervention.

She might be immune to it (her life-force is also seemingly uncountable or simply doesn't have a value at all according to Bloodedge Experience novel).

Iznami couldn't be killed because her time ended long ago - according to the English version (so in a way she also is an exception to the time-line, as she exists long after her time ended). So in other words, the time existed for her, but her remaining time reached it's end.

Plus the Time Killer wasn't fully explained either. Hakumen says that he kills the "time" that the target possess. The time that a person has, is usually the one that remains for that person, the one that has already passed generally isn't counted. In this case, this would mean that Hukemen merely kills the remaining life-span. The problem is that the Susanoo unit allows cutting time without inducing paradoxes, so even if he had killed the time that has also passed, it wouldn't affect the world at all. Of course, seeing as Izanami was immune to it as her remaining time/life-span had ended, pretty much confirms that Time Killer merely kills off the remaining time and not the full one (otherwise, Iznami's time that was already spent would have been affected and yet it wasn't).

So, if the time that a person posses, can be considered as the remaining one, in other words, the remaining life-span, then the Time Killer wouldn't be able to kill Rachel, whose life-force doesn't have a value, as that would mean that her life-span also doesn't have a set value (so there is nothing to "kill"). Basically, Time Killer can't destroy a person, if that person no longer possess, or never possessed a (remaining) time.